Skip to main content

Is Google Really Providing Free Speech For Us?


Google says the First Amendment should apply to its search results — even if this allows the company to favor its own products over those of its competitors. Is this a legitimate argument?
shouting, free speechphoto: Aaron Amot
Rumors are swirling that the federal government is about to sue Google over claims that the company rigs its search results. Google has responded by invoking its right to free speech — but not everyone is buying this.

Tim Wu, a prominent law professor at Columbia, is not convinced that Google is invoking its First Amendment rights in good faith. He suggests that Google and other big companies are cynically invoking constitutional freedoms as part of a corporate deregulation agenda.

“We’re living in a golden age of First Amendment opportunism,” said Wu, speaking Friday at a Penn Law School conference titled “The Evolving Internet.”

In Wu’s view, search results are not really speech in the first space. Instead, he argues, Google’s algorithms are closer to other automated communication tools like navigation devices or even car alarms.

Google, of course, doesn’t share this view. The company prefers to be compared to a newspaper editor — whose choice of what to put in the paper is an undisputed free speech right. In practical terms, this means Google should be able to favor its own restaurant reviews over competing services like Yelp.

So who is right? Most of us would agree with Wu that Google’s search results fall somewhere in the middle of a communication continuum where the editor is on one end and the car alarm is on the other. The hard question is whether Google is far enough along the line to qualify for the First Amendment.

More broadly, this dilemma doesn’t apply just to Google. In the age of the algorithm, other companies may also rush to protect computer-based communication. Should Amazon, for instance, be allowed to argue that its product recommendation are a form of free speech?

The point here is that the choice of whether or not to sue Google is part of a larger process in which the country must decide where free speech stops and legitimate regulation begins.

Comments

zaidewadman said…
From Roulette to Three Card Poker, Blackjack to Punto Banco, slots to high-limit gaming, Pasha Global Casinos have all of the motion you can want at the center of the Strip. Increased state costs to implement playing legal guidelines, not more likely to|prone to} exceed the low tens of millions of dollars annually. Some of those costs presumably be} offset by the increase in state revenues. The new civil enforcement method would create extra work for DOJ and the state courts. DOJ would want to evaluate and reply to claims that playing legal guidelines are being damaged. State courts would also need to course of any civil 더킹카지노 lawsuits filed.

Popular Posts